Market Loss Assistance Program in Meade County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 637
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Meade County, South Dakota totaled $5,326,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kenny Matt | Elm Springs, SD 57791 | $45,236 |
22 | Martin Baker | Whitewood, SD 57793 | $45,136 |
23 | Walter R Miller | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $43,335 |
24 | Mary I Miller | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $43,335 |
25 | Jeffery D Barber | Enning, SD 57737 | $42,519 |
26 | Glen Barber | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $41,599 |
27 | Thomas C Simmons | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $41,205 |
28 | Alen W Sigman | Black Hawk, SD 57718 | $40,516 |
29 | Chad Finneman | Rapid City, SD 57703 | $40,256 |
30 | Thomas E Lien | Rapid City, SD 57709 | $37,151 |
31 | Darel Clayton Casteel | Vale, SD 57788 | $33,589 |
32 | Follette Farm Inc | Vale, SD 57788 | $32,705 |
33 | Clyde Arneson | Elm Springs, SD 57791 | $32,223 |
34 | Boydstons Inc | Box Elder, SD 57719 | $31,185 |
35 | Robert Grubl | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $29,977 |
36 | Timothy J Komes | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $29,612 |
37 | Harold A Oberlander | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $28,597 |
38 | Vaudeth Oberlander | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $28,573 |
39 | Lynn M Fields | Elm Springs, SD 57791 | $28,276 |
40 | Steve Bestgen | Whitewood, SD 57793 | $27,909 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”