Farm Subsidy information
Mellette County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Mellette County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 326
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mellette County, South Dakota totaled $6,935,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | E Y Cattle Company Llp | White River, SD 57579 | $34,058 |
42 | Rodney L Vollmer | Black Hawk, SD 57718 | $33,295 |
43 | James L Newbold | White River, SD 57579 | $33,142 |
44 | Dominic M Harmon | Wood, SD 57585 | $32,457 |
45 | Daniel L Krogman | White River, SD 57579 | $31,003 |
46 | Jerry A Hicks | Norris, SD 57560 | $30,885 |
47 | Roger E Glynn | Belvidere, SD 57521 | $30,667 |
48 | Trevor C Farmer | Mission, SD 57555 | $30,282 |
49 | Bradley Tuttle | Winner, SD 57580 | $30,020 |
50 | Cheyenne W Schmidt | Norris, SD 57560 | $29,841 |
51 | 3 - Q Cattle Company | White River, SD 57579 | $29,328 |
52 | Steve Krogman | White River, SD 57579 | $29,252 |
53 | Neil Krogman | White River, SD 57579 | $28,647 |
54 | James Bennett | Gregory, SD 57533 | $28,197 |
55 | Charles Fortune | Belvidere, SD 57521 | $27,642 |
56 | Tenny Gene Hight | White River, SD 57579 | $27,571 |
57 | Daniel L Taft | Norris, SD 57560 | $27,513 |
58 | John Herber | Kadoka, SD 57543 | $27,505 |
59 | Paul Gropper | Long Valley, SD 57547 | $27,466 |
60 | James Herber | Kadoka, SD 57543 | $27,445 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”