Loan Deficiency in Minnehaha County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,713
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Minnehaha County, South Dakota totaled $44,717,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Marvin Manifold | Sioux Falls, SD 57110 | $220,818 |
22 | Roger Fiegen | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $219,087 |
23 | Randall Raymond Albers | Hartford, SD 57033 | $203,492 |
24 | Marsh & Marsh Partnership | Humboldt, SD 57035 | $197,670 |
25 | Derry Benson | Sioux Falls, SD 57107 | $190,299 |
26 | Duane Harvey | Baltic, SD 57003 | $188,713 |
27 | Dale C Zweep | Garretson, SD 57030 | $186,173 |
28 | Burns Brothers Partnership | Baltic, SD 57003 | $184,716 |
29 | Donovan J Gelderman | Hartford, SD 57033 | $182,806 |
30 | William J Klein | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $180,849 |
31 | Wintersteen Farms | Sioux Falls, SD 57107 | $178,088 |
32 | Ricky Lynn Starnes | Humboldt, SD 57035 | $174,079 |
33 | Tom R Meyer | Humboldt, SD 57035 | $172,461 |
34 | Francis Michael Grace | Hartford, SD 57033 | $171,318 |
35 | Bradley Wayne Nussbaum | Garretson, SD 57030 | $169,952 |
36 | James E Klein | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $165,954 |
37 | Steve Mcgee | Sioux Falls, SD 57107 | $162,465 |
38 | Brian Howe | Sherman, SD 57030 | $161,660 |
39 | Paul A Evenson | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 | $161,201 |
40 | Michael G Williams | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 | $160,536 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”