Loan Deficiency in Potter County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 431
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Potter County, South Dakota totaled $23,847,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Smr Farms Inc | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $164,095 |
42 | Nagel Grain Farm | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $159,365 |
43 | Nolt Farms Inc | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $158,153 |
44 | Robert Glenn Westphal | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $149,091 |
45 | B W Simon Inc | Hoven, SD 57450 | $148,913 |
46 | V T Farms Inc | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $147,700 |
47 | Joyce Wager | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $144,982 |
48 | Emv Farm Inc | Hoven, SD 57450 | $143,997 |
49 | Schaefer Agronomics Inc | Seneca, SD 57473 | $143,601 |
50 | Ray Goebel And Sons Inc | Lebanon, SD 57455 | $142,226 |
51 | Jdg Farms Inc | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $141,805 |
52 | Poeppel Farms Partnership | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $135,859 |
53 | N J Lemler Inc | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $135,237 |
54 | M D Harer Farms Inc | Hoven, SD 57450 | $132,349 |
55 | Darrell Harer | Hoven, SD 57450 | $130,696 |
56 | Rudy Jacobs | Tolstoy, SD 57475 | $128,862 |
57 | Gerald William Frost | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $127,886 |
58 | Ronald Vernon Larson | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $126,410 |
59 | Kent Nauman | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $126,394 |
60 | Wilbert Edward Fenger | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $125,013 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”