Farm Subsidy information
Roberts County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Roberts County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 960
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Roberts County, South Dakota totaled $25,905,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sisseton-wahpeton Oyate | Agency Village, SD 57262 | $538,884 |
2 | Benjamin Sand Dba Lake Valley Far | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $276,436 |
3 | Piotter Family Farms Inc | New Effington, SD 57255 | $188,602 |
4 | Ldi Ltd | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $169,468 |
5 | Whetstone Valley Honey Inc | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $159,838 |
6 | Allen James Meyer | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $134,203 |
7 | Rm Foltz Inc | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $123,596 |
8 | Jacob P Schaunaman | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $99,050 |
9 | Curtis Curran | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $96,436 |
10 | Sherry Alice Deboer | Corona, SD 57227 | $91,159 |
11 | Buffalo Lake Ranch Inc | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $82,115 |
12 | Andrew Robert Meyer | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $77,847 |
13 | Jason W Kriz | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $74,232 |
14 | Paul Eugene Deboer | Corona, SD 57227 | $72,375 |
15 | Prins Ranch Inc | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $72,293 |
16 | Kohl Farms Inc | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $71,258 |
17 | Amy Jo Piotter | New Effington, SD 57255 | $71,043 |
18 | Robert Neil Meyer | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $70,376 |
19 | Daniel Marvin Piotter | New Effington, SD 57255 | $66,251 |
20 | Garret Scott Leverson | New Effington, SD 57255 | $58,504 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>