Total Conservation Programs in Roberts County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,701
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Roberts County, South Dakota totaled $106,234,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bernard Rolstad | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $556,879 |
22 | Clifford Wade Krause | Hankinson, ND 58041 | $530,514 |
23 | Larry J Lekness | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $523,878 |
24 | Dale Letze | Summit, SD 57266 | $519,054 |
25 | Janeen Kohl | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $517,864 |
26 | Brian Vig | Claire City, SD 57224 | $517,435 |
27 | William Nigg Living Trust | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $510,374 |
28 | Allen Peterson | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $491,763 |
29 | Leon Koeppe | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $479,616 |
30 | Myron Koeppe | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $475,633 |
31 | Curtis Hanssen | Summit, SD 57266 | $461,942 |
32 | Roger Haanen | Browns Valley, MN 56219 | $456,609 |
33 | Lynn Monroe Bredvik | New Effington, SD 57255 | $451,141 |
34 | Neil Long | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $447,408 |
35 | Kenneth Arthur Anderson | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $446,456 |
36 | James Swanson | Ortley, SD 57256 | $434,176 |
37 | Francis Braun | New Effington, SD 57255 | $430,505 |
38 | Orville Schultz | Watertown, SD 57201 | $421,679 |
39 | Dale Gilbert Medenwald | New Effington, SD 57255 | $421,232 |
40 | Verne Wolfe | Claire City, SD 57224 | $410,206 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”