Farm Subsidy information

Spink County, South Dakota

Total Subsidies in Spink County, South Dakota, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,076

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Spink County, South Dakota totaled $866,439,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1Glendale Hutterian Brethren IncFrankfort, SD 57440$4,363,369
2Spink Hutterian IncFrankfort, SD 57440$3,959,801
3Hillside Hutterian BrethrenDoland, SD 57436$3,915,795
4Bixler FarmsHitchcock, SD 57348$3,842,379
5Gatzke Farms PartnershipHitchcock, SD 57348$3,214,780
6Noethlich BrosDoland, SD 57436$3,125,643
7Mendel Farms PartnershipDoland, SD 57436$3,066,282
8Clark Hutt Breth IncRaymond, SD 57258$3,008,141
9Armadale Farms IncMellette, SD 57461$2,900,286
10Camrose Hutterian Brethren IncFrankfort, SD 57440$2,706,271
11Esser Farms IncRedfield, SD 57469$2,612,664
12Bottum Brothers PartnershipTulare, SD 57476$2,589,813
13Robert Irwin MeierDoland, SD 57436$2,415,861
14Klebsch Farms IncRedfield, SD 57469$2,319,704
15R & B Mielke IncConde, SD 57434$2,255,566
16Belle Plaine Hutterian Brethren IDoland, SD 57436$2,233,418
17Clemensen Farms IncAberdeen, SD 57401$2,072,250
18Boekelheide Farms IncNorthville, SD 57465$2,045,037
19Todd Paul HoferDoland, SD 57436$1,956,542
20K Olson IncSioux Falls, SD 57101$1,917,644

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag