Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Spink County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 172
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Spink County, South Dakota totaled $3,420,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | C & L Hearnen | Conde, SD 57434 | $250,000 |
2 | Camrose Hutterian Brethren Inc | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $125,000 |
3 | William Victor Hearnen | Conde, SD 57434 | $94,675 |
4 | Don Joseph Hearnen | Conde, SD 57434 | $92,502 |
5 | Wal-di Inc | Mellette, SD 57461 | $91,736 |
6 | Clemensen Farms Inc | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $90,468 |
7 | Tolvstad Farms Inc | Mellette, SD 57461 | $80,900 |
8 | Klebsch Farms Inc | Redfield, SD 57469 | $77,836 |
9 | Michael Watson | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $71,478 |
10 | Hansen Farms | Turton, SD 57477 | $69,899 |
11 | Jeffrey R Hansen | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $63,445 |
12 | James Dean Smith | Conde, SD 57434 | $56,553 |
13 | Clark Hutt Breth Inc | Raymond, SD 57258 | $56,504 |
14 | Dane Lambert | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $56,210 |
15 | Roy Eldon Buchholz | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $55,378 |
16 | Belle Plaine Hutterian Brethren I | Doland, SD 57436 | $54,290 |
17 | Mark Labrie | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $53,912 |
18 | Teddy Lee Pazour | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $53,863 |
19 | Gary Felderman | Doland, SD 57436 | $53,711 |
20 | Daniel Enander | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $49,735 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>