Conservation Reserve Program in Stanley County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 91
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $960,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Michael S Bergeson | Cottage Grove, MN 55016 | $5,691 |
42 | Dena Merchen | Powder Springs, GA 30127 | $5,598 |
43 | William H Maddocks | Woodland, CA 95695 | $5,120 |
44 | Michael M Nemec | Midland, SD 57552 | $4,923 |
45 | Robert K Clair Jr | Pierre, SD 57501 | $3,974 |
46 | Laura Lynn Lock | Minot, ND 58703 | $3,689 |
47 | Mark Ballew | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $3,688 |
48 | Roger Ballew | Pierre, SD 57501 | $3,688 |
49 | Deadwood Trail Ranch | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $3,476 |
50 | Medicine Creek Ranch LLC | Pierre, SD 57501 | $3,128 |
51 | Lance Creek Ranch LLC | Rapid City, SD 57702 | $3,006 |
52 | Leonard Andersen | Hayes, SD 57537 | $2,692 |
53 | Larry Mcquistion | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,526 |
54 | Triple S Farms Partnership | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,080 |
55 | Steven Joe Gray | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,911 |
56 | Charlotte A Fischer | Midland, SD 57555 | $1,741 |
57 | Clint L Alleman | Hayes, SD 57537 | $1,626 |
58 | Levi Neuharth | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,459 |
59 | Crystal Dianne Neuharth | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,459 |
60 | Mary S Turner | Pierre, SD 57501 | $1,405 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”