Total Disaster Programs in Stanley County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 153
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Stanley County, South Dakota totaled $7,845,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lower Brule Farm Corp | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $275,115 |
2 | W L Thompson Ranch Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $268,111 |
3 | , | $233,650 | |
4 | Clint L Alleman | Hayes, SD 57537 | $228,107 |
5 | Zay Norman Family Ranch LLC | Hayes, SD 57537 | $219,118 |
6 | Prince & Sons Inc | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $190,497 |
7 | Carlson Cattle Co LLC | Keenesburg, CO 80643 | $180,282 |
8 | Hansine Ranch Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $179,206 |
9 | Marc Russell Scarborough | Hayes, SD 57537 | $171,509 |
10 | Mortenson Cattle Co LLC | Hayes, SD 57537 | $168,712 |
11 | Triple S Farms Partnership | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $162,601 |
12 | Willow Creek Jv | Pierre, SD 57501 | $153,139 |
13 | Scott Pazour | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $146,683 |
14 | Tim & Diane Olson Partnership | Hayes, SD 57537 | $141,336 |
15 | R & D Tibbs Inc | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $140,115 |
16 | Mork Norman | Hayes, SD 57537 | $132,112 |
17 | 3j Cattle Company LLC | Midland, SD 57552 | $129,581 |
18 | Clifford Tibbs | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $129,268 |
19 | Terry Beastrom | Pierre, SD 57501 | $127,412 |
20 | Mitch Norman | Hayes, SD 57537 | $122,862 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>