Total Conservation Programs in Sully County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 525
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Sully County, South Dakota totaled $35,622,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kirk F Yackley | Onida, SD 57564 | $353,141 |
22 | Weinheimer Farms Inc | Onida, SD 57564 | $345,010 |
23 | Matzen Partnership | Onida, SD 57564 | $339,488 |
24 | C H Yackley Inc | Onida, SD 57564 | $326,241 |
25 | Jackie Yackley | Onida, SD 57564 | $322,150 |
26 | Lamb Brothers Partnership | Onida, SD 57564 | $319,312 |
27 | David L Pitlick | Onida, SD 57564 | $317,605 |
28 | Howard D Clark & Sons Family Limited Partnership | Onida, SD 57564 | $306,379 |
29 | Emf Farms Inc | Onida, SD 57564 | $306,124 |
30 | Gregory A Yackley | Onida, SD 57564 | $287,405 |
31 | S & S Farms | Harrold, SD 57536 | $278,230 |
32 | Glenda Minder Family Limited Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $275,324 |
33 | C Dejuan Strickland | Onida, SD 57564 | $267,403 |
34 | John T Hughes Revocable Trust | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $265,107 |
35 | Sutton Rodeos Inc | Onida, SD 57564 | $251,055 |
36 | Garnett S Robinson | Garden Plain, KS 67050 | $237,430 |
37 | Thomas Ranch Partnership | Harrold, SD 57536 | $236,786 |
38 | Larry Wilcox Trust | Onida, SD 57564 | $235,512 |
39 | Porter Nuttall Trust Udt June 29, 2010-admin Trust | Agar, SD 57520 | $230,709 |
40 | Rodnee Grueb | Onida, SD 57564 | $230,605 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”