Farm Subsidy information
Union County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Union County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 704
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $16,495,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gerdes Pharmacy Inc | Denver, CO 80220 | $48,701 |
22 | Heeren Farms Partnership | Akron, IA 51001 | $48,554 |
23 | Heeren Circle H Fms Inc | Akron, IA 51001 | $48,542 |
24 | John Trudeau | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $48,429 |
25 | Frank Raymond Minor | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $48,285 |
26 | Vaughn Arden Johnson | Alcester, SD 57001 | $48,276 |
27 | Reid Allen Bird | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $47,969 |
28 | Chad Howard Fennel | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $47,586 |
29 | Allen James Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $46,659 |
30 | Wagner Limited Partnership | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $46,604 |
31 | Larry Donald Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $46,578 |
32 | Steven Harold Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $46,063 |
33 | Vera Dailey | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $46,025 |
34 | Van Ballegooyen Brothers Inc | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $44,015 |
35 | Dennis John Chicoine | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $43,278 |
36 | David Wendell Larsen | Burbank, SD 57010 | $43,019 |
37 | Heckathorn Fms Inc | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $42,931 |
38 | Dwight Merl Fickbohm | Akron, IA 51001 | $42,686 |
39 | Larry Lee Nilson Revocable Trust | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $42,242 |
40 | Craig Wilken | Akron, IA 51001 | $41,090 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”