Farm Subsidy information
Tennessee
Total Subsidies in Tennessee, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 32,607
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Tennessee totaled $244,626,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kelley Enterprises | Burlison, TN 38015 | $970,448 |
| 2 | Baggett & Ebb Farms | Springfield, TN 37172 | $895,269 |
| 3 | Mac-beth Farms | Springfield, TN 37172 | $648,382 |
| 4 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $632,984 |
| 5 | Fincher Family Partnership | Halls, TN 38040 | $575,637 |
| 6 | Insouth Bank ** | Covington, TN 38019 | $560,201 |
| 7 | Simmons 1st National Bank ** | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $516,207 |
| 8 | Mid-south Family Farms | Ripley, TN 38063 | $513,678 |
| 9 | Scott Strawberry & Tomato Farms Inc | Unicoi, TN 37692 | $490,482 |
| 10 | Couch Farms | Jackson, TN 38301 | $458,774 |
| 11 | Tosh Farms | Henry, TN 38231 | $419,237 |
| 12 | David Bryan Livestock Co | Morrison, TN 37357 | $403,872 |
| 13 | Tri-turf Sod Farms Inc | Paris, TN 38242 | $401,289 |
| 14 | Payne's Farm | Arlington, TN 38002 | $384,473 |
| 15 | Bank Of Fayette County ** | Somerville, TN 38068 | $371,818 |
| 16 | Sneed Brothers | Millington, TN 38053 | $365,491 |
| 17 | Tyson Farms Partnership | Denmark, TN 38391 | $360,877 |
| 18 | Brittney L Baggett | Springfield, TN 37172 | $357,002 |
| 19 | Botanico Inc | Mcminnville, TN 37111 | $338,139 |
| 20 | Verell Family Farms | Jackson, TN 38301 | $337,735 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf