Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Clay County, Tennessee, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 41
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Clay County, Tennessee totaled $64,276 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Patrick Wright | Moss, TN 38575 | $7,750 |
2 | Charles Toby Russell | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $3,325 |
3 | Dennis Smith | Celina, TN 38551 | $3,070 |
4 | Joseph R Jolin | Moss, TN 38575 | $2,500 |
5 | Carrell Clements | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $2,500 |
6 | Rickey T Melton | Celina, TN 38551 | $2,500 |
7 | Ronald Dean Roberts | Lafayette, TN 37083 | $2,500 |
8 | Jo Nell Mclerran | Moss, TN 38575 | $2,500 |
9 | Douglas Browning | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $2,500 |
10 | Mack Clements | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $2,500 |
11 | Ray D Clements | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $2,500 |
12 | Robert Edward Lowe | Allons, TN 38541 | $1,980 |
13 | Larry Clements | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $1,980 |
14 | William R Grace | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $1,842 |
15 | Louvennia Gentry | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $1,734 |
16 | Danny Stone | Celina, TN 38551 | $1,650 |
17 | Terry Rich | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $1,616 |
18 | Dennis Purcell | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $1,584 |
19 | Delmus Collins | Red Boiling Springs, TN 37150 | $1,229 |
20 | Randall Kimes | Celina, TN 38551 | $1,226 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>