Emergency Conservation Program in Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 9,181
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Texas totaled $86,740,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Annette Henscey | Dayton, TX 77535 | $200,000 |
42 | Hope Plantation New | Telephone, TX 75488 | $200,000 |
43 | Hair Cattle, LLC | Texarkana, TX 75503 | $200,000 |
44 | Russell Kilpatrick Ranch, LLC | Moore Haven, FL 33471 | $200,000 |
45 | Lewis Humphreys Charitable Trust | Amarillo, TX 79121 | $200,000 |
46 | J E Sherman | China, TX 77613 | $196,745 |
47 | Harley Ranching | Paris, TX 75462 | $196,325 |
48 | Bobby Jack Enloe | Montgomery, TX 77316 | $193,956 |
49 | John Benoit | Port Arthur, TX 77642 | $185,714 |
50 | Canada Ranch | Anahuac, TX 77514 | $185,105 |
51 | Mattye Carter Family Trust | Fort Worth, TX 76109 | $182,650 |
52 | Pitchfork Land & Cattle Co | Guthrie, TX 79236 | $180,014 |
53 | L P Whittington | Devers, TX 77538 | $174,384 |
54 | Trina Jo Norwood | Orange, TX 77630 | $172,868 |
55 | Mill Iron South Ltd | Dallas, TX 75225 | $168,531 |
56 | Ben & Lois Parks Family Partnersh | Rockwall, TX 75087 | $168,279 |
57 | , | $166,521 | |
58 | Harkins & Van Cleve Cattle Company LLC | Beeville, TX 78102 | $165,976 |
59 | Mary J Broussard-ford | Beaumont, TX 77706 | $165,019 |
60 | Joel E Levingston | Beaumont, TX 77705 | $164,987 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”