Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Briscoe County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 182
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Briscoe County, Texas totaled $12,170,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dick Cogdell | Tulia, TX 79088 | $1,095,117 |
2 | Rex Edwin Glover | Matador, TX 79244 | $877,902 |
3 | Coon Creek Cattle Co | Silverton, TX 79257 | $566,431 |
4 | Rank Cogdell | Tulia, TX 79088 | $453,129 |
5 | Burson Cattle Co | Silverton, TX 79257 | $433,494 |
6 | W D Thornberry | Clarendon, TX 79226 | $410,114 |
7 | Leeland Cushing Smith | Clarendon, TX 79226 | $364,609 |
8 | Circle M 8 Land & Cattle | Salado, TX 76571 | $351,671 |
9 | Mayfield Cattle Co | Silverton, TX 79257 | $346,749 |
10 | Ted Daugherty | Silverton, TX 79257 | $344,364 |
11 | Cogdell Ranch Company | Tulia, TX 79088 | $306,480 |
12 | Jim D Cogdell | Tulia, TX 79088 | $300,327 |
13 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $275,050 |
14 | Ken Wood | Silverton, TX 79257 | $261,716 |
15 | John Edward Schott | Silverton, TX 79257 | $232,700 |
16 | Questionable Cattle Co | Tulia, TX 79088 | $227,907 |
17 | Jimmy Burson | Silverton, TX 79257 | $226,761 |
18 | B Brent Campbell | Turkey, TX 79261 | $202,785 |
19 | Douglas Forbes | Silverton, TX 79257 | $200,024 |
20 | La Quetta Jo Schott | Silverton, TX 79257 | $187,828 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>