Loan Deficiency in Calhoun County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 352
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Calhoun County, Texas totaled $5,044,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Albert L Malaer | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $251,519 |
2 | Mark Malaer | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $243,287 |
3 | B & B Joint Venture | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $197,266 |
4 | Sullivan Brothers Inc | Horseshoe Bend, AR 72512 | $174,322 |
5 | Padre Farms Inc | Corpus Christi, TX 78468 | $168,515 |
6 | Pl Farms Inc | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $164,957 |
7 | Wesley Hobizal | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $152,369 |
8 | Nunley Brothers | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $147,378 |
9 | Austin Ryon Sanders | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $140,848 |
10 | Simon Cornelius Estate | Victoria, TX 77902 | $131,249 |
11 | Tony Wayne Daniel | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $125,923 |
12 | Michael Mutchler | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $93,162 |
13 | Mark And Teresa Malaer Joint Ve | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $92,193 |
14 | J & L Farms Jv | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $90,852 |
15 | Louis Wayne Neill | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $90,056 |
16 | Teresa Malaer | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $85,588 |
17 | Kenneth Jerome Hahn | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $74,045 |
18 | Shannon Farms | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $72,650 |
19 | Howard Neill Sr | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $67,837 |
20 | James E Shannon Jr | Port Lavaca, TX 77979 | $67,482 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>