Farm Subsidy information
Cameron County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Cameron County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 560
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cameron County, Texas totaled $17,105,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Willie W Wells | San Benito, TX 78586 | $53,652 |
42 | Wadkins Farms LLC | Harlingen, TX 78552 | $52,853 |
43 | Sharon I Lane Trust | Blooming Grove, TX 76626 | $51,832 |
44 | John Scaief Farms LLC | San Benito, TX 78586 | $51,702 |
45 | Carl A Hensz Farms | Harlingen, TX 78552 | $50,983 |
46 | Rio Hondo Implement Co Inc | Harlingen, TX 78552 | $49,414 |
47 | 3c Ag Services LLC | Mercedes, TX 78570 | $49,000 |
48 | Aqua Dulce Farm Trust 924 | Saint Charles, IL 60175 | $48,291 |
49 | Carl Bauer Farms LLC | Harlingen, TX 78552 | $47,099 |
50 | Rio Rancho Farms | Harlingen, TX 78553 | $47,068 |
51 | Arroyo Farms | Harlingen, TX 78550 | $46,005 |
52 | Davis & Davis | Combes, TX 78535 | $45,773 |
53 | Phillipp Farms | La Feria, TX 78559 | $45,543 |
54 | Keith Burns Farms LLC | Harlingen, TX 78552 | $45,207 |
55 | White-tipped Dove LLC | Brownsville, TX 78521 | $44,052 |
56 | 4m Cotton Cattle & Grain | San Benito, TX 78586 | $42,867 |
57 | Temporall LLC | Rancho Viejo, TX 78575 | $42,785 |
58 | Barry D Waters Dba Bdw Farms | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $42,427 |
59 | Mark Abbott Farms | Harlingen, TX 78550 | $42,023 |
60 | San Miguel Partnership | Rancho Viejo, TX 78575 | $41,504 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”