Peanut Quota Buyout Program in Haskell County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 253
Recipients of Peanut Quota Buyout Program from farms in Haskell County, Texas totaled $1,907,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Peanut Quota Buyout Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Fonda Newton | Haskell, TX 79521 | $103,790 |
2 | Phillip D Newton | Haskell, TX 79521 | $103,785 |
3 | Elaine Glover | Rochester, TX 79544 | $88,440 |
4 | John Ben Glover | Rochester, TX 79544 | $88,440 |
5 | Jane Short | Rochester, TX 79544 | $81,345 |
6 | Warren D Short | Rochester, TX 79544 | $81,340 |
7 | Jo Evelyn Patterson | Rochester, TX 79544 | $44,925 |
8 | Michael Edwin Adkins | Rochester, TX 79544 | $43,435 |
9 | Irene M Ratliff | Lubbock, TX 79416 | $40,530 |
10 | Bettis Est Properties | Stamford, TX 79553 | $38,815 |
11 | Betty Heitsch Rev Living Tr-betty Heitsch | Granbury, TX 76049 | $34,585 |
12 | Maude Maxine Hamilton | Rochester, TX 79544 | $31,465 |
13 | Georgia L Kelton | Reno, TX 75462 | $30,075 |
14 | Joyce Turner | Rule, TX 79547 | $29,545 |
15 | Samuel Cole Turner Jr | Rochester, TX 79544 | $29,220 |
16 | Susan Mullino Turner | Rochester, TX 79544 | $28,525 |
17 | Riggins Est | Haskell, TX 79521 | $27,390 |
18 | Wynell Wadzeck | Rochester, TX 79544 | $23,900 |
19 | Laymon O Newton | Haskell, TX 79521 | $21,880 |
20 | Vera L Newton | Rochester, TX 79544 | $21,880 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>