Farm Subsidy information
Jeff Davis County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Jeff Davis County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 36
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jeff Davis County, Texas totaled $2,303,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kokernot 06 Ranch Inc | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $281,574 |
| 2 | Means Ranch Co Ltd | Van Horn, TX 79855 | $207,587 |
| 3 | Los Medio Corporation | Corpus Christi, TX 78403 | $95,374 |
| 4 | David Dean Sr. | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $88,354 |
| 5 | Espy Family Ranches LLC | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $73,995 |
| 6 | 3-d Cattle Company | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $67,225 |
| 7 | John Luedecke | Alpine, TX 79831 | $53,563 |
| 8 | Antelope Valley Ranch | Deming, NM 88030 | $44,394 |
| 9 | Bar O Land And Cattle Company LLC | Balmorhea, TX 79718 | $43,877 |
| 10 | Rancho Espuela Cattle Co | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $40,916 |
| 11 | Miller Ranch | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $30,861 |
| 12 | Gearhart Ranch Partners | Midland, TX 79702 | $30,586 |
| 13 | J Dyer III Ltd | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $29,342 |
| 14 | A R Eppenauer III | Marfa, TX 79843 | $27,503 |
| 15 | Alfred G Means Jr | Valentine, TX 79854 | $25,390 |
| 16 | Compana Cattle Co | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $22,071 |
| 17 | U-up-u-down LLC | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $19,984 |
| 18 | Jim White III | Marfa, TX 79843 | $16,864 |
| 19 | Jamie Dyer Dean | Fort Davis, TX 79734 | $16,022 |
| 20 | Rick Tate | Marfa, TX 79843 | $12,782 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf