Farm Subsidy information
Jim Hogg County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Jim Hogg County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 73
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jim Hogg County, Texas totaled $1,277,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | East Foundation Ranches LLC | San Antonio, TX 78216 | $211,365 |
2 | Jones Ranch LLC | Corpus Christi, TX 78401 | $73,709 |
3 | Hellen/schrab Ranches Ltd | Houston, TX 77079 | $47,776 |
4 | Ciguena Land & Cattle Co Inc | Rio Hondo, TX 78583 | $42,031 |
5 | Bill Barfield | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $30,850 |
6 | Lopez Cattle Co LLC | Laredo, TX 78040 | $23,941 |
7 | Humberto D Martinez | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $15,402 |
8 | Erasmo Montemayor | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $14,527 |
9 | Jorge A Pena | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $11,235 |
10 | Victor M Garcia | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $10,465 |
11 | Perfecta G Trevino | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $9,937 |
12 | Stephen R Lopez | Laredo, TX 78040 | $9,050 |
13 | Violeta Beefmasters Ld | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $8,595 |
14 | Mario Martinez | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $8,406 |
15 | 44 Coyotes Ranch LLC | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $8,200 |
16 | Ernesto R Gutierrez | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $8,088 |
17 | Noriecitas Ranch | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $7,852 |
18 | W W Jones III | Corpus Christi, TX 78401 | $5,912 |
19 | Armstrong Ranch Ltd | Corpus Christi, TX 78401 | $5,777 |
20 | Cristela A Montalvo | Hebbronville, TX 78361 | $5,503 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>