Farm Subsidy information
Jim Wells County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Jim Wells County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,736
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jim Wells County, Texas totaled $186,648,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Prukop Farms | Premont, TX 78375 | $8,741,210 |
2 | Gwosdz Three Farms | Sandia, TX 78383 | $6,270,301 |
3 | Schneider Bros | Premont, TX 78375 | $5,788,971 |
4 | Keith & Zak Adams | Agua Dulce, TX 78330 | $2,923,100 |
5 | Jerry H Nock | Alice, TX 78332 | $2,206,408 |
6 | David Hoelscher | Alice, TX 78332 | $2,189,966 |
7 | Roy & Penny Pillack Jv | Agua Dulce, TX 78330 | $2,124,566 |
8 | Gwosdz Brothers | Sandia, TX 78383 | $1,754,854 |
9 | Seeligson Ranch LLC | Houston, TX 77002 | $1,642,725 |
10 | Frank J Hoelscher Jr | Corpus Christi, TX 78413 | $1,474,512 |
11 | Edmund A Pawlik Inc | Alice, TX 78333 | $1,456,777 |
12 | La Tierra Farms Inc | Agua Dulce, TX 78330 | $1,446,189 |
13 | Garry J Nock | Agua Dulce, TX 78330 | $1,425,379 |
14 | Nesloney Brothers Farms | Orange Grove, TX 78372 | $1,386,088 |
15 | Richard & Pam Lowman Jv | Iola, TX 77861 | $1,385,526 |
16 | Skip Row Farms, LLC. | Alice, TX 78333 | $1,274,997 |
17 | Palo Hueco Farms Inc | Alice, TX 78332 | $1,194,623 |
18 | Hamilton Farms | Riviera, TX 78379 | $1,191,272 |
19 | Daniel & Betty Prukop | Alice, TX 78332 | $1,162,233 |
20 | Skip Row West LLC | Alice, TX 78333 | $1,152,632 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>