Total Commodity Programs in Pecos County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 80
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pecos County, Texas totaled $1,185,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dennis & Sandra Braden, Jv | Coyanosa, TX 79730 | $249,188 |
2 | Mandujano Brothers | Coyanosa, TX 79730 | $112,806 |
3 | Akb Joint Venture | Coyanosa, TX 79730 | $90,756 |
4 | Mckenzie Land & Livestock Company | Encino, NM 88321 | $64,087 |
5 | Longfellow Ranch Partners Lp | Addison, TX 75001 | $42,674 |
6 | Elmer C Braden Jr | Coyanosa, TX 79730 | $41,966 |
7 | Harral Livestock Co LLC | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $40,253 |
8 | David Zachry Hess | Coyanosa, TX 79730 | $39,938 |
9 | Schuyler Byron Wight III Dba Yt Ranch | Goldsmith, TX 79741 | $39,209 |
10 | Elton Randal Hartman | Mc Camey, TX 79752 | $37,762 |
11 | Suter Farms LLC | Coyanosa, TX 79730 | $32,270 |
12 | Neill Woodward | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $27,544 |
13 | Joe Hayter | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $24,163 |
14 | Pecos Co State Bk ** | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $21,414 |
15 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $18,293 |
16 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $18,198 |
17 | Ele Chris Hagelstein III | Sanderson, TX 79848 | $15,202 |
18 | E Wayne Tinkler | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $13,626 |
19 | Hector Castaneda Ruiz | Coyanosa, TX 79730 | $11,505 |
20 | West Texas Helicopters Inc | Mason, TX 76856 | $11,258 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>