Total Commodity Programs in Pecos County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 385
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pecos County, Texas totaled $31,833,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Larry Doyle Drgac | Mc Camey, TX 79752 | $306,150 |
22 | R Gerald Porter | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $301,937 |
23 | Schuyler Byron Wight III Dba Yt Ranch | Goldsmith, TX 79741 | $278,087 |
24 | Mary Taylor | Pecos, TX 79772 | $275,013 |
25 | Thomas D Strube | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $266,547 |
26 | Bradley R Grady | Hico, TX 76457 | $246,754 |
27 | Mike Jernigan | Iraan, TX 79744 | $237,340 |
28 | Harral Livestock Co LLC | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $235,099 |
29 | Longfellow Ranch Partners Lp | Addison, TX 75001 | $225,556 |
30 | Hoelscher Land & Cotton | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $223,445 |
31 | Steven H Hoelscher | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $217,105 |
32 | Jerome F Hoelscher Inc | Garden City, TX 79739 | $210,958 |
33 | Pearcy Operating Corp | Midland, TX 79707 | $205,772 |
34 | Ernest Woodward Ranches | Mc Camey, TX 79752 | $197,765 |
35 | Randy & Mary Taylor Jv | Pecos, TX 79772 | $180,049 |
36 | Alvaro Mandujano Jr | Coyanosa, TX 79730 | $179,862 |
37 | Neill Woodward | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $178,525 |
38 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $171,870 |
39 | Pecos Co State Bk ** | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $171,404 |
40 | Marsha N Wolfe | Mc Camey, TX 79752 | $161,174 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”