Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Pecos County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 115
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Pecos County, Texas totaled $9,677,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Neill Woodward | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $475,977 |
2 | Harral Livestock Co LLC | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $456,905 |
3 | Seth Sawyer | Iraan, TX 79744 | $454,323 |
4 | R Gerald Porter | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $368,185 |
5 | John J Berry | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $344,471 |
6 | Burch & Neill Livestock | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $317,619 |
7 | Gerald Porter Operating LLC | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $312,938 |
8 | Mike Jernigan | Iraan, TX 79744 | $271,699 |
9 | Dillard A Harral | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $259,107 |
10 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $247,560 |
11 | Hickman Ranch | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $239,941 |
12 | Schuyler Byron Wight III Dba Yt Ranch | Goldsmith, TX 79741 | $229,337 |
13 | E Wayne Tinkler | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $208,684 |
14 | Conoly O Brooks III | San Angelo, TX 76906 | $195,300 |
15 | Hickman Ranch | Big Lake, TX 76932 | $170,941 |
16 | Ernest Woodward Ranches | Mc Camey, TX 79752 | $166,058 |
17 | Mark Hursh | Alpine, TX 79831 | $165,702 |
18 | Walter Groth | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $165,113 |
19 | Robert D Hayter | Fort Stockton, TX 79735 | $161,222 |
20 | Six Shooter Ranches, LLC | Mccamey, TX 79752 | $153,164 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>