Farm Subsidy information
Starr County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Starr County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 393
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $6,140,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Alfonso H Perez | Roma, TX 78584 | $13,894 |
42 | Ana Lisa Garza | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $12,745 |
43 | Arturo D Ibarra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $12,601 |
44 | Ida Lou Perez | Roma, TX 78584 | $12,130 |
45 | Paula R Garcia | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $12,075 |
46 | Ruben Palacios | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $11,534 |
47 | Paul Floyd Jr | San Benito, TX 78586 | $11,250 |
48 | Norberto Salinas | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $11,181 |
49 | Tomas E Villarreal | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $11,055 |
50 | Guerra Cattle Co | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $11,014 |
51 | Gloria B Guerra | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $10,969 |
52 | Malechek And Westmoland Family Lp | Barksdale, TX 78828 | $10,955 |
53 | Lucio Eden Gonzalez Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $10,917 |
54 | Miguel A Montalvo | Edinburg, TX 78539 | $10,852 |
55 | Romualdo Solis Jr | Roma, TX 78584 | $10,754 |
56 | William Wilson | Edinburg, TX 78541 | $10,522 |
57 | Exiquio Saenz | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $10,455 |
58 | Lauro H & Dora M Salinas Trust | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $10,046 |
59 | G L And C LLC | San Isidro, TX 78588 | $9,941 |
60 | Derly F Guerra | Mission, TX 78572 | $9,876 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”