Farm Subsidy information
Starr County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Starr County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 393
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Starr County, Texas totaled $6,140,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | El Triangulo Cattle Co | Roma, TX 78584 | $24,521 |
22 | Eusebio Saenz Jr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $23,795 |
23 | Dora Sylvia S Garcia | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $22,808 |
24 | Juan Carlos Salinas | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $22,808 |
25 | F & T Farms And Cattle Co | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $22,771 |
26 | Ociel Mendoza Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $21,987 |
27 | Wesley J Vanderpool | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $21,403 |
28 | Aracely Vanderpool | Sullivan City, TX 78595 | $21,403 |
29 | Alberto Martinez | Roma, TX 78584 | $20,318 |
30 | Amandos Beefmasters Cattle Co LLC | Roma, TX 78584 | $19,751 |
31 | Blas Pedro Saenz Jr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $19,730 |
32 | Verne T. Vanderpool | Alamo, TX 78516 | $16,620 |
33 | David Brock | Mountain View, CA 94040 | $15,381 |
34 | Stephen Brock | Austin, TX 78727 | $15,381 |
35 | Manuel L Elizondo | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $15,343 |
36 | Uvaldo Salinas Jr | Rio Grande City, TX 78582 | $15,234 |
37 | Jim I Mills Jr | Santa Elena, TX 78591 | $14,833 |
38 | Laura Mills Harrison | El Paso, TX 79932 | $14,833 |
39 | Reavis Farms Inc | Mcallen, TX 78504 | $14,686 |
40 | Alejandro T Martinez | Linn, TX 78563 | $14,343 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”