Total Commodity Programs in Titus County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 248
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Titus County, Texas totaled $556,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Brian A Hunnicutt | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $3,485 |
42 | Tony Anschutz | Mt Pleasant, TX 75455 | $3,329 |
43 | Monty L Price | Mt Pleasant, TX 75455 | $3,209 |
44 | Larry Dewayne Morris | Mount Vernon, TX 75457 | $3,205 |
45 | Christopher D Basham | Mount Pleasant, TX 75456 | $3,191 |
46 | Ricky Rosewell | Cookville, TX 75558 | $3,088 |
47 | Anita Elizabeth Posey | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,977 |
48 | Kurtis Mathias | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,972 |
49 | Jeff Bell | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,864 |
50 | James Jay Fox | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,812 |
51 | Bobby D Burns | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,812 |
52 | Johnny French | Pittsburg, TX 75686 | $2,708 |
53 | Richard Holland | Cookville, TX 75558 | $2,708 |
54 | Barbara Goolsby Griffis | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,707 |
55 | Dwain Fortenberry | Cookville, TX 75558 | $2,649 |
56 | Robert Hollis | Talco, TX 75487 | $2,603 |
57 | Travis Priefert | Mt Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,588 |
58 | James R Baggerman | Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,501 |
59 | Roberto Marroquin | Mt Pleasant, TX 75455 | $2,501 |
60 | Ricky Tigert | Daingerfield, TX 75638 | $2,442 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”