Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Wharton County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 582
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Wharton County, Texas totaled $3,410,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R & R Turf Farms Lp | Wharton, TX 77488 | $37,184 |
22 | Boettcher & Quirey | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $33,588 |
23 | Bulls-eye Partners | Ganado, TX 77962 | $32,038 |
24 | T P Farms | Eagle Lake, TX 77434 | $32,020 |
25 | Anthony Joseph Kresta | El Campo, TX 77437 | $30,787 |
26 | Commercial State Bank ** | Ferris, TX 75125 | $29,851 |
27 | Cooperative Finance Association ** | El Campo, TX 77437 | $28,350 |
28 | Paul J Krenek | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $26,535 |
29 | Terry & Mary Ann Brandl Farms Jv | El Campo, TX 77437 | $25,549 |
30 | Julie Diane Strnadel | El Campo, TX 77437 | $25,059 |
31 | Jaz Farms | El Campo, TX 77437 | $24,766 |
32 | Robert Louis Kainer | El Campo, TX 77437 | $24,493 |
33 | Roades Farms Jv | Louise, TX 77455 | $24,138 |
34 | Dennis D Cervenka | Lane City, TX 77453 | $23,618 |
35 | Todd Riha | El Campo, TX 77437 | $23,458 |
36 | Toby L Riha | El Campo, TX 77437 | $23,458 |
37 | Kathryn Jean Riha | El Campo, TX 77437 | $23,282 |
38 | Glenn Louis Riha | El Campo, TX 77437 | $23,282 |
39 | Alan C Fitzgerald | Lane City, TX 77453 | $23,204 |
40 | Reynolds Farm Partnership | Wharton, TX 77488 | $19,975 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”