Total Commodity Programs in Wharton County, Texas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,347
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wharton County, Texas totaled $18,050,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Darrell Schoeneberg | Louise, TX 77455 | $110,396 |
22 | Popp Farms 05 | El Campo, TX 77437 | $107,938 |
23 | Gary & Jeanette Schoenfield Ptr | El Campo, TX 77437 | $106,975 |
24 | H & K Farms | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $103,308 |
25 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $102,921 |
26 | Hlavinka Cattle Co Jv | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $100,629 |
27 | Horizon Farms Jv | Wharton, TX 77488 | $100,528 |
28 | Lr Farms | El Campo, TX 77437 | $100,089 |
29 | L And S Joint Venture | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $98,473 |
30 | Freeman C3 Jv | Brookshire, TX 77423 | $87,002 |
31 | Stacey Wayne Dennis | Louise, TX 77455 | $86,534 |
32 | The First State Bank ** | Columbus, TX 78934 | $82,916 |
33 | Dean A Hansen | El Campo, TX 77437 | $77,179 |
34 | Forgason Division | Hungerford, TX 77448 | $76,784 |
35 | Ggs Farms | Victoria, TX 77904 | $76,369 |
36 | W & J Gavranovic Joint Venture | Wharton, TX 77488 | $72,967 |
37 | Rod Grass Farms LLC | El Campo, TX 77437 | $68,365 |
38 | David Polak Farms | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $66,272 |
39 | J & N Farms | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $66,036 |
40 | M & W Farm & Ranch Partnership | Egypt, TX 77436 | $65,999 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”