Farm Subsidy information
Wharton County, Texas
Total Subsidies in Wharton County, Texas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 281 to 300 of 5,545
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wharton County, Texas totaled $1,010,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
281 | Ggs Farms | Victoria, TX 77904 | $779,035 |
282 | Donaldson Farms | Wharton, TX 77488 | $778,117 |
283 | Kathryn & Leigh A Allen | El Campo, TX 77437 | $778,054 |
284 | Raymond L Brandes | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $777,029 |
285 | Devils Pocket Inc | Louise, TX 77455 | $776,413 |
286 | Merrill C Swanson | El Campo, TX 77437 | $773,689 |
287 | Russell Wayne Richter Sr | El Campo, TX 77437 | $770,155 |
288 | Megan M Schoenfield | El Campo, TX 77437 | $770,039 |
289 | Grain Associates Limited | Wharton, TX 77488 | $768,789 |
290 | Werner F Pavlik | El Campo, TX 77437 | $763,526 |
291 | Frank Macha Farms | Hungerford, TX 77448 | $763,256 |
292 | Edith I Stovall Trusts | El Campo, TX 77437 | $762,144 |
293 | Paul J Krenek | East Bernard, TX 77435 | $761,612 |
294 | Frank E Mann Jr | Wharton, TX 77488 | $755,885 |
295 | A J Richter Jr | El Campo, TX 77437 | $755,616 |
296 | Paul A Koudela | El Campo, TX 77437 | $752,284 |
297 | First Financial Bank ** | Abilene, TX 79601 | $749,141 |
298 | Wayne Anthony Priesmeyer | El Campo, TX 77437 | $748,419 |
299 | Jason Zalman | El Campo, TX 77437 | $741,672 |
300 | Glenn E Cerny | El Campo, TX 77437 | $734,233 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”