Farm Subsidy information
Cache County, Utah
Total Subsidies in Cache County, Utah, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 514
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cache County, Utah totaled $8,618,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cox Honey Of Utah LLC | Mendon, UT 84325 | $169,239 |
| 2 | West Hills Dairy Farm Inc | Newton, UT 84327 | $164,533 |
| 3 | Smith's Cream Pitcher Jerseys Inc | Lewiston, UT 84320 | $160,607 |
| 4 | Gibbons Farm Holdings LLC | Lewiston, UT 84320 | $146,934 |
| 5 | C And C Hoover Farms, LLC | Monticello, AR 71655 | $145,841 |
| 6 | River View Dairy | Smithfield, UT 84335 | $144,117 |
| 7 | W Lee Reese | Smithfield, UT 84335 | $142,439 |
| 8 | Dan L Wright Lewiston Partnership | Lewiston, UT 84320 | $140,182 |
| 9 | T & W Farms LLC | Lewiston, UT 84320 | $136,447 |
| 10 | Bert D Reese & Sons Inc | Smithfield, UT 84335 | $136,198 |
| 11 | Ev & Jw Hall Dairy Lc | Lewiston, UT 84320 | $134,812 |
| 12 | C L Barlow Inc | Lewiston, UT 84320 | $134,146 |
| 13 | Ropies Dairy Inc | Hyrum, UT 84319 | $133,981 |
| 14 | D Kent Buttars | Lewiston, UT 84320 | $132,293 |
| 15 | Lunday Dairy Inc | Cornish, UT 84308 | $131,241 |
| 16 | M Dunford Weston Family Partnership | Logan, UT 84321 | $130,317 |
| 17 | Meikle Brothers Inc | Smithfield, UT 84335 | $130,203 |
| 18 | Harris Dairyland Inc | Richmond, UT 84333 | $129,537 |
| 19 | Andrew Dairy Inc | Trenton, UT 84338 | $127,173 |
| 20 | Munk Family Farms, LLC | Amalga, UT 84335 | $127,173 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf