Total Commodity Programs in Rich County, Utah, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 151
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Rich County, Utah totaled $6,871,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Argyles' Ranch Inc | Randolph, UT 84064 | $722,579 |
2 | Jw Cattle Company | Randolph, UT 84064 | $298,246 |
3 | Rs Cattle Company Inc | Randolph, UT 84064 | $269,816 |
4 | Maitland Webb | Woodruff, UT 84086 | $269,329 |
5 | Peart Ranch Operations LLC | Randolph, UT 84064 | $265,831 |
6 | Rees Land & Livestock Co | Woodruff, UT 84086 | $236,246 |
7 | Jackson Land & Livestock LLC | Randolph, UT 84064 | $168,961 |
8 | Lazy S Ranching Inc | Laketown, UT 84038 | $162,816 |
9 | Hoffman Ranches LLC | Randolph, UT 84064 | $146,004 |
10 | Putnam Ranch Llp | Randolph, UT 84064 | $142,942 |
11 | Alfred Kearl & Sons Inc | Laketown, UT 84038 | $124,709 |
12 | B & H Ranching Company Inc | Laketown, UT 84038 | $123,923 |
13 | Weston Hereford Ranch LLC | Laketown, UT 84038 | $123,194 |
14 | Wine Cup Cattle Co Inc | Randolph, UT 84064 | $113,293 |
15 | Rafter J Cattle LLC | Woodruff, UT 84086 | $113,100 |
16 | Bar W Bar Ranch Inc | Randolph, UT 84064 | $108,019 |
17 | Kennedy Ranch LLC | Randolph, UT 84064 | $106,472 |
18 | Big Creek Ranch & Cattle Inc | Laketown, UT 84038 | $104,288 |
19 | Hd Livestock | Randolph, UT 84064 | $97,897 |
20 | Hatch Land & Livestock Co | Randolph, UT 84064 | $96,809 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>