Conservation Reserve Program in Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 524
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Vermont totaled $11,425,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Rockledge Maple Trust | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $60,812 |
42 | Vern-mont Farm LLC | Vernon, VT 05354 | $60,588 |
43 | Bessette Farms LLC | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $59,770 |
44 | Robert J Balfe | Whiting, VT 05778 | $58,959 |
45 | Hall And Breen Farm LLC | Orwell, VT 05760 | $58,186 |
46 | Carl Phelps | Brandon, VT 05733 | $57,531 |
47 | Kimball Brook Farm LLC | North Ferrisburgh, VT 05473 | $56,978 |
48 | Boyden Farm LLC | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $56,403 |
49 | Carol Dunsmore | Swanton, VT 05488 | $56,020 |
50 | Arnold & Linda Mercy | Montgomery Center, VT 05471 | $55,891 |
51 | Paul & Rene Saenger | Shoreham, VT 05770 | $55,463 |
52 | Jonathan P & Maryann Connor | Vergennes, VT 05491 | $54,532 |
53 | Nop Brothers & Sons | Plainview, TX 79072 | $53,331 |
54 | Kathleen Richards-babcock | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $53,305 |
55 | Gibb Family Trust | Middlebury, VT 05753 | $53,016 |
56 | North Williston Cattle Co Inc | Williston, VT 05495 | $52,288 |
57 | Adrian & Marie Rainville | Franklin, VT 05457 | $51,952 |
58 | Harold Giard | Bridport, VT 05734 | $50,151 |
59 | Roger & Patricia Scholten | Weybridge, VT 05753 | $50,052 |
60 | Nicole Lapierre | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $49,678 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”