Direct Payment Program in Caledonia County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 143
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Caledonia County, Vermont totaled $721,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Simpson Farm | Sutton, VT 05867 | $98,460 |
2 | Burke View Dairies Inc | Sutton, VT 05867 | $46,203 |
3 | Bruce & Catherine Roy | East Ryegate, VT 05042 | $31,795 |
4 | Laggis Farm LLC | East Hardwick, VT 05836 | $31,058 |
5 | Lucky Hill Farm Llp | Danville, VT 05828 | $27,388 |
6 | Don Sim Farm Partnership Llp | Sutton, VT 05867 | $26,185 |
7 | Bruce & Gail Nelson | East Ryegate, VT 05042 | $26,185 |
8 | Roy Patterson | Danville, VT 05828 | $22,567 |
9 | Kempton Farms Inc | Peacham, VT 05862 | $20,626 |
10 | Scotch Burn Farm LLC | East Ryegate, VT 05042 | $18,321 |
11 | Bullock Clayton & Kevin | St Johnsbury, VT 05819 | $16,925 |
12 | William & Jennifer Nelson | Ryegate, VT 05042 | $16,656 |
13 | J Denis & Claire Michaud | East Hardwick, VT 05836 | $14,692 |
14 | Paul & Rosemary Gingue | Waterford, VT 05819 | $13,606 |
15 | Lamothe Dairy Farm LLC | Saint Johnsbury, VT 05819 | $13,214 |
16 | Gary A Olcott | Concord, VT 05824 | $13,149 |
17 | William & Grant Nelson Farm | Ryegate, VT 05042 | $13,047 |
18 | Fremont & Marsha Nelson | East Ryegate, VT 05042 | $12,108 |
19 | Larry & Dorothy Willson | Waterford, VT 05819 | $11,428 |
20 | Harold Webster | Danville, VT 05828 | $9,850 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>