Direct Payment Program in Essex County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 45
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Essex County, Vermont totaled $339,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert A Baum | Canaan, VT 05903 | $1,363 |
22 | Monte Kennedy | West Charleston, VT 05872 | $1,212 |
23 | Charles White & Sons | Colebrook, NH 03576 | $1,029 |
24 | Scott R Lefoll | Maidstone, VT 05905 | $909 |
25 | Heather Lefoll | Maidstone, VT 05905 | $909 |
26 | Roger Irwin | Maidstone, VT 05905 | $739 |
27 | Rachel E Cole | Lunenburg, VT 05906 | $669 |
28 | Charles J Cole Jr | Lunenburg, VT 05906 | $669 |
29 | Diana Jeffrey | Lemington, VT 05903 | $550 |
30 | Helen R Smart | Guildhall, VT 05905 | $516 |
31 | Chester G Smart | Guildhall, VT 05905 | $516 |
32 | William Endrizzi | Guildhall, VT 05905 | $506 |
33 | Richard Birt | Lunenburg, VT 05906 | $408 |
34 | Christine Birt | Lunenburg, VT 05906 | $408 |
35 | John Nugent | North Stratford, NH 03590 | $344 |
36 | Darcy R Smart | Brunswick, VT 05905 | $323 |
37 | Calvin Colby | Lunenburg, VT 05906 | $279 |
38 | Brian Porter | Island Pond, VT 05846 | $162 |
39 | Robert Porter | Island Pond, VT 05846 | $78 |
40 | Sandra Porter | Island Pond, VT 05846 | $78 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”