Total Commodity Programs in Grand Isle County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 162
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Grand Isle County, Vermont totaled $8,052,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Newton & Darlene Reynolds | Alburgh, VT 05440 | $1,005,897 |
2 | Bullis Savage View Farm, LLC | Grand Isle, VT 05458 | $919,655 |
3 | Andre P Quintin | North Hero, VT 05474 | $558,341 |
4 | Savage View Farm | Grand Isle, VT 05458 | $471,468 |
5 | Timstead Farms Inc | South Hero, VT 05486 | $422,590 |
6 | Sunset Lake Farm No 2 LLC | South Burlington, VT 05403 | $368,869 |
7 | G Palardy Farm | Alburg, VT 05440 | $337,982 |
8 | Andrew Paradee | Grand Isle, VT 05458 | $301,319 |
9 | Newton J Reynolds | Alburg, VT 05440 | $269,544 |
10 | Henry Bros. Wolfridge Dairy LLC | Alburgh, VT 05440 | $255,960 |
11 | J & M Ladd Families Farm | Alburgh, VT 05440 | $217,683 |
12 | Sunset Lake Farm LLC | South Burlington, VT 05403 | $188,629 |
13 | Ralph William Lawrence | South Hero, VT 05486 | $157,617 |
14 | Maurice & Karen Fortin | Alburgh, VT 05440 | $128,821 |
15 | Islandacres Farm LLC | South Hero, VT 05486 | $124,117 |
16 | John L Roy | South Hero, VT 05486 | $116,259 |
17 | Borderview Farm | Alburg, VT 05440 | $93,132 |
18 | Germain Bourdeau | Swanton, VT 05488 | $91,110 |
19 | Joseph E Sprano Jr | Alburgh, VT 05440 | $85,319 |
20 | Jean J Palardy | Alburg, VT 05440 | $85,150 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>