Loan Deficiency in Rutland County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 168
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Rutland County, Vermont totaled $1,489,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Goulds Mt View Farm Inc | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $22,898 |
22 | Bryant & Bryant Partnership | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $21,755 |
23 | Steven Or Patrick Saltis | Poultney, VT 05764 | $21,340 |
24 | Lewisholm Valley Farm Inc | West Pawlet, VT 05775 | $20,208 |
25 | Finnell Hollow Farm Inc | Poultney, VT 05764 | $20,198 |
26 | Glen C Hayward Jr | Castleton, VT 05735 | $19,783 |
27 | Orin Thomas & Sons Inc | Rutland, VT 05702 | $19,509 |
28 | Sheldon Farm Inc | Fair Haven, VT 05743 | $19,361 |
29 | Frank J Grabowski | Castleton, VT 05735 | $19,169 |
30 | James & Ruth Hathaway | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $18,947 |
31 | David L Tooley | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $18,784 |
32 | Jesse D Billings III | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $18,461 |
33 | Alan Cooper | Wells, VT 05774 | $17,768 |
34 | Richard Hulett Sr | West Pawlet, VT 05775 | $17,561 |
35 | Ronald L Wetherby | Fair Haven, VT 05743 | $16,485 |
36 | Charles E Mulcahy Sr | Brandon, VT 05733 | $15,786 |
37 | Martin L Harding II | Brandon, VT 05733 | $15,173 |
38 | Quesnels Holsteins Inc | Whiting, VT 05778 | $14,273 |
39 | Don D Dame Jr | Brandon, VT 05733 | $14,056 |
40 | W Edward Lewis | West Pawlet, VT 05775 | $13,921 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”