Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Windsor County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 115
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Windsor County, Vermont totaled $161,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wayne Townsend | Bethel, VT 05032 | $2,174 |
22 | Frederick C Koloski Sr | Orleans, VT 05860 | $2,169 |
23 | Richardson Farm | Woodstock, VT 05091 | $2,115 |
24 | Francis Lockwood | Springfield, VT 05156 | $2,043 |
25 | Dwight Sargent | Norwich, VT 05055 | $2,003 |
26 | David M Ainsworth | South Royalton, VT 05068 | $1,868 |
27 | Clarence & Judith Sanders | Bethel, VT 05032 | $1,868 |
28 | Ray Moore | Springfield, VT 05156 | $1,861 |
29 | Linda Moore | Springfield, VT 05156 | $1,861 |
30 | Harvey Hastings | West Windsor, VT 05089 | $1,836 |
31 | Derrick C Wright | Randolph, VT 05060 | $1,809 |
32 | Stevens Fair View Farm Partnershi | Springfield, VT 05156 | $1,787 |
33 | Woodstock Foundation Inc | Woodstock, VT 05091 | $1,701 |
34 | Robert A Ketchum | Stockbridge, VT 05772 | $1,683 |
35 | Don A Bigelow | Bethel, VT 05032 | $1,674 |
36 | Robert Shute | Hartland, VT 05048 | $1,656 |
37 | Janet Messier | Randolph Center, VT 05061 | $1,620 |
38 | Star Hill Dairy | South Woodstock, VT 05071 | $1,580 |
39 | James Kinnarney | South Royalton, VT 05068 | $1,553 |
40 | Richard Luce | White River Junction, VT 05001 | $1,427 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”