Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,268
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Virginia totaled $118,658,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Moore Farms Of Skippers Partnership | Skippers, VA 23879 | $356,698 |
22 | Broaddus Farms II | Bowling Green, VA 22427 | $348,726 |
23 | Rosemont Farms LLC | Courtland, VA 23837 | $348,122 |
24 | Guy Newman | Virginia Beach, VA 23454 | $347,783 |
25 | Creamfield Farm, LLC | Mechanicsville, VA 23116 | $342,064 |
26 | Philip Edwards Farms | Smithfield, VA 23430 | $335,713 |
27 | A L Bailey Farms | Waverly, VA 23890 | $335,693 |
28 | Heath Cutrell | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $328,056 |
29 | David Rew Farms Inc | Accomac, VA 23301 | $326,620 |
30 | Harewell Farms LLC | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $326,206 |
31 | Harris Farms Inc | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $317,346 |
32 | William B Bain | Dinwiddie, VA 23841 | $315,322 |
33 | Jeffrey Allan Seward | Elberon, VA 23846 | $314,624 |
34 | Hanzlik Farms Inc | Waverly, VA 23890 | $313,824 |
35 | Chappell Farms LLC | Dinwiddie, VA 23841 | $306,936 |
36 | R Randolph & Sons LLC | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $299,829 |
37 | Kettle Wind Farm LLC | Nokesville, VA 20181 | $299,350 |
38 | Cedear Lane Farms LLC | Windsor, VA 23487 | $299,083 |
39 | Sturgis Farms Inc | Painter, VA 23420 | $292,037 |
40 | Haile Farm LLC | Dunnsville, VA 22454 | $289,882 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”