Farm Subsidy information
Virginia
Total Subsidies in Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 79,047
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Virginia totaled $3,317,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pilgrim's Pride Corporation | Broadway, VA 22815 | $26,290,734 |
2 | Cargill Turkey Products | Harrisonburg, VA 22801 | $17,558,687 |
3 | Engel Family Farms | Hanover, VA 23069 | $9,079,344 |
4 | Lowe Brothers | Ivor, VA 23866 | $6,561,011 |
5 | Glover Farms Partnership | Suffolk, VA 23437 | $6,481,851 |
6 | Beechland Farms II Partners | Surry, VA 23883 | $5,639,387 |
7 | A L Bailey Farms | Waverly, VA 23890 | $5,161,026 |
8 | Cohoke Farm LLC | West Point, VA 23181 | $5,033,589 |
9 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $4,741,862 |
10 | Philip Edwards Farms | Smithfield, VA 23430 | $4,576,724 |
11 | Cloverfield Enterprises | Champlain, VA 22438 | $4,450,276 |
12 | L&g Farms | Emporia, VA 23847 | $4,390,718 |
13 | Frank Holland Jr | Suffolk, VA 23437 | $4,344,912 |
14 | Chappell Farms LLC | Dinwiddie, VA 23841 | $4,028,410 |
15 | John N Mills & Sons | Hanover, VA 23069 | $3,950,633 |
16 | Davis & Sons Inc | Courtland, VA 23837 | $3,917,109 |
17 | William B Bain | Dinwiddie, VA 23841 | $3,847,806 |
18 | George H Alvis Jr & Sons | Manakin Sabot, VA 23103 | $3,771,960 |
19 | Agri-land | Center Cross, VA 22437 | $3,757,484 |
20 | North Point Farm Inc | Waynesboro, VA 22980 | $3,555,630 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>