Total Commodity Programs in Fauquier County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 528
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Fauquier County, Virginia totaled $20,953,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | O B Messick & Sons Inc | Midland, VA 22728 | $1,197,664 |
2 | Kenneth K Smith Dba Cool Lawn Holsteins LLC | Remington, VA 22734 | $1,161,094 |
3 | Al Mara Farm Inc | Midland, VA 22728 | $993,113 |
4 | Cool Lawn Holsteins LLC | Remington, VA 22734 | $876,279 |
5 | Wilbur E Ritchie | Bealeton, VA 22712 | $736,520 |
6 | Woodbourne Farm | Warrenton, VA 20186 | $616,435 |
7 | Albert J Bender | Calverton, VA 20138 | $583,374 |
8 | Wainbur Farm LLC | Midland, VA 22728 | $467,699 |
9 | David Earle Burton | Calverton, VA 20138 | $451,725 |
10 | Calvin L Ritchie Estate | Bealeton, VA 22712 | $447,116 |
11 | Diamond T Joy Farm LLC | Catlett, VA 20119 | $404,167 |
12 | Calvin L Ritchie Trust | Bealeton, VA 22712 | $382,096 |
13 | Twin Willow Farm | Catlett, VA 20119 | $368,560 |
14 | William Eric Fox | Remington, VA 22734 | $358,134 |
15 | John C Bauserman Inc | Orlean, VA 20128 | $348,654 |
16 | Wilbur W Burton | Calverton, VA 20138 | $327,039 |
17 | Eliyahu Falcon | Midland, VA 22728 | $287,290 |
18 | A Woodrow Patton | Midland, VA 22728 | $267,150 |
19 | Claude Price Jr | Sumerduck, VA 22742 | $266,286 |
20 | Hi-hope Farm Original LLC | Calverton, VA 20138 | $226,217 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>