Total Commodity Programs in Hanover County, Virginia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 83
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Hanover County, Virginia totaled $1,944,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | H Hoge Smith | Ruther Glen, VA 22546 | $4,543 |
42 | R Randolph & Sons LLC | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $3,942 |
43 | Norman L Puryear | Ashland, VA 23005 | $3,920 |
44 | James W Crowder | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $3,732 |
45 | Timothy Anderson Brannan | Studley, VA 23162 | $3,693 |
46 | George H Alvis Jr & Sons | Manakin Sabot, VA 23103 | $3,606 |
47 | Hanover Peach Orchard, LLC | Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | $3,521 |
48 | Edmund S Simpson III | King William, VA 23086 | $3,238 |
49 | W Pettus Gilman | Glen Allen, VA 23059 | $3,110 |
50 | Alpheus Kay Kirby | Mechanicsville, VA 23116 | $2,976 |
51 | Edward Glen Talley | Mechanicsville, VA 23116 | $2,852 |
52 | Jeff Sears | Ashland, VA 23005 | $2,735 |
53 | John T Peace | Hanover, VA 23069 | $2,721 |
54 | Edwin C Schwartz | Glen Allen, VA 23059 | $2,704 |
55 | Samuel H Moody | Beaverdam, VA 23015 | $2,375 |
56 | Coleman Blake Hancock | Beaverdam, VA 23015 | $2,324 |
57 | Glenn Martin | Glen Allen, VA 23059 | $1,779 |
58 | Eugene M Washington II | King William, VA 23086 | $1,468 |
59 | Charles N Kirby | Mechanicsville, VA 23116 | $1,167 |
60 | Alvin Terry Mcneely | Bumpass, VA 23024 | $1,145 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”