Direct Payment Program in King George County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 96
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in King George County, Virginia totaled $1,807,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Herbert Wilkerson & Son Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $333,995 |
2 | Robert R Morgan Jr | King George, VA 22485 | $166,043 |
3 | Cloverfield Enterprises | Champlain, VA 22438 | $135,887 |
4 | Kermit P Thomas Jr | Port Royal, VA 22535 | $129,876 |
5 | W Thomas Hicks | Rappahannock Academy, VA 22538 | $128,815 |
6 | Tate And Tate Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $107,669 |
7 | Perry G Bowen III | Jersey, VA 22481 | $91,094 |
8 | Waterloo Farms | King George, VA 22485 | $53,915 |
9 | John Cleveland Owens | King George, VA 22485 | $43,184 |
10 | E Miles Hastings | Dogue, VA 22451 | $42,263 |
11 | River Farm Va LLC | King George, VA 22485 | $36,437 |
12 | Charles L Henderson | Fredericksburg, VA 22405 | $30,632 |
13 | Lawrence E Carr Jr | King George, VA 22485 | $28,224 |
14 | Ruth C Morie | King George, VA 22485 | $27,910 |
15 | Jane Mcdaniel | King George, VA 22485 | $27,819 |
16 | Rodney D Rollins | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $23,605 |
17 | Herbert L Williams | King George, VA 22485 | $23,017 |
18 | James Pitts | King George, VA 22485 | $22,794 |
19 | Cloverfield Enterprises | Champlain, VA 22438 | $19,095 |
20 | Naji P Maloof | Prince Frederick, MD 20678 | $17,932 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>