Farm Subsidy information
Mathews County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in Mathews County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 69
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mathews County, Virginia totaled $3,090,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William C Burroughs | Mechanicsville, VA 23116 | $3,577 |
42 | G Thomas Abernathy Jr | Atlanta, GA 30309 | $2,720 |
43 | Wilson H Davis | Mobjack, VA 23056 | $2,624 |
44 | New Point Oyster Company LLC | Arlington, VA 22204 | $2,457 |
45 | John Balderson | Mathews, VA 23109 | $2,343 |
46 | Robert W Mccreary | North, VA 23128 | $2,199 |
47 | Arnold T Davis | Mobjack, VA 23056 | $2,174 |
48 | Kevin Godsey | Onemo, VA 23130 | $2,096 |
49 | Sheldon Lumber Company Inc | Toano, VA 23168 | $1,841 |
50 | Elsie Haynes | Gloucester, VA 23061 | $1,488 |
51 | West Point Log Corporation | West Point, VA 23181 | $1,359 |
52 | Melvin Dean Snead | North, VA 23128 | $1,318 |
53 | Ashley Logging Company Inc | Mattaponi, VA 23110 | $925 |
54 | Perry Mason Forrest | Port Haywood, VA 23138 | $804 |
55 | Robert L South | Gloucester, VA 23061 | $746 |
56 | Benjamin Watson South | Gloucester, VA 23061 | $746 |
57 | James W Godsey | Poquoson, VA 23662 | $654 |
58 | Jerry A Ligon | Gwynn, VA 23066 | $636 |
59 | Hugh Soles | Saluda, VA 23149 | $603 |
60 | Richard D Booker | Richmond, VA 23235 | $581 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”