Farm Subsidy information
Mathews County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in Mathews County, Virginia, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 69
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mathews County, Virginia totaled $2,923,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Nelson T Whitehead | North, VA 23128 | $523,914 |
2 | Robert T Respess Jr | Foster, VA 23056 | $431,920 |
3 | Lewis Brothers | Dutton, VA 23050 | $167,981 |
4 | Sea Farms Inc | Hudgins, VA 23076 | $122,452 |
5 | James E Leigh | Gloucester, VA 23061 | $113,893 |
6 | Lewis Brothers Farm LLC | Dutton, VA 23050 | $112,599 |
7 | J Warren Callis Sr | Hudgins, VA 23076 | $105,658 |
8 | J Warren Callis Jr | Hudgins, VA 23076 | $60,147 |
9 | Cammie Gustafson-flanagan | North, VA 23128 | $59,392 |
10 | Clifford Lee Smith | Bohannon, VA 23021 | $56,319 |
11 | R Turner Davis | North, VA 23128 | $31,670 |
12 | William S Harwood | Gloucester, VA 23061 | $24,816 |
13 | Richard E Callis | Cobbs Creek, VA 23035 | $24,381 |
14 | John V Slaughter Jr | Hudgins, VA 23076 | $23,621 |
15 | Richard H Leigh | Gloucester, VA 23061 | $23,047 |
16 | Krista Gustafson | North, VA 23128 | $20,997 |
17 | Hayberry Corporation | Mathews, VA 23109 | $18,494 |
18 | 3 Hands Oyster Company, LLC | Henrico, VA 23229 | $17,643 |
19 | Isleham Associates | Norfolk, VA 23505 | $17,417 |
20 | Olo, LLC | Henrico, VA 23229 | $15,278 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>