Farm Subsidy information
Patrick County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in Patrick County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,069
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Patrick County, Virginia totaled $18,872,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Joe Bill Slate | Mount Airy, NC 27030 | $67,815 |
42 | Samuel M Hairston | Chatham, VA 24531 | $65,985 |
43 | James A Guynn | Ararat, VA 24053 | $65,130 |
44 | Dtb Farms Of Stokes County, LLC | Lawsonville, NC 27022 | $65,121 |
45 | Austin Levi Carter | Meadows Of Dan, VA 24120 | $64,343 |
46 | Christian Michael Taylor | Stuart, VA 24171 | $63,581 |
47 | Gatha Lankford | Claudville, VA 24076 | $63,415 |
48 | Duncan Venable Merritt | Stuart, VA 24171 | $63,402 |
49 | Dan Smith | Ararat, VA 24053 | $62,324 |
50 | Wesley A Thompson | Ararat, VA 24053 | $62,029 |
51 | John D Wood | Stuart, VA 24171 | $61,392 |
52 | C T Trent Jr | Patrick Springs, VA 24133 | $59,005 |
53 | Puckett Greenhouses LLC | Ararat, VA 24053 | $56,871 |
54 | Calvin L Payne | Ararat, VA 24053 | $56,296 |
55 | Kathy Anderson | Stuart, VA 24171 | $54,184 |
56 | Horton Logging LLC | Ararat, VA 24053 | $52,875 |
57 | Wade Lee Hawks Dba Wlh Lumber Company | Ararat, VA 24053 | $52,875 |
58 | Kenneth L Bowman | Claudville, VA 24076 | $52,875 |
59 | Mayo River Lumber Company Inc. | Stuart, VA 24171 | $52,875 |
60 | Halls Plants & Produce Inc. | Ararat, VA 24053 | $51,637 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”