Total Commodity Programs in Prince George County, Virginia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 51
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Prince George County, Virginia totaled $455,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | S & J Farms LLC | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $45,903 |
2 | Alex W Bresko Jr | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $43,628 |
3 | Sean Patrick Finney | South Prince George, VA 23805 | $42,412 |
4 | Stephen G Rosbicki | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $42,010 |
5 | Ronald W Nicholson | Waverly, VA 23890 | $41,594 |
6 | W L Dickens | Prince George, VA 23875 | $26,998 |
7 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $24,667 |
8 | Engel Family Farms | Hanover, VA 23069 | $21,992 |
9 | Crutchfield Farms LLC | Prince George, VA 23875 | $21,159 |
10 | Emmett W Cibula | Prince George, VA 23875 | $19,354 |
11 | Joseph H Wooden Jr | Spring Grove, VA 23881 | $17,175 |
12 | George J Reiter Jr | North Dinwiddie, VA 23805 | $11,900 |
13 | The Bank Of Southside Virginia ** | Wakefield, VA 23888 | $11,699 |
14 | Robert S Kvasnicka | South Prince George, VA 23805 | $8,296 |
15 | Hanzlik Farms Inc | Waverly, VA 23890 | $8,222 |
16 | South Bend Farms LLC | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $6,803 |
17 | Old Brandon Farm LLC | Spring Grove, VA 23881 | $6,066 |
18 | Marsh Isle Farm, LLC | Disputanta, VA 23842 | $5,191 |
19 | Parham Farms LLC | North Dinwiddie, VA 23805 | $4,936 |
20 | Timothy P Cibula | Prince George, VA 23875 | $4,532 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>