Farm Subsidy information
Rappahannock County, Virginia
Total Subsidies in Rappahannock County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 204
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Rappahannock County, Virginia totaled $5,561,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Miller Properties Lc | Sperryville, VA 22740 | $375,182 |
2 | Dale Welch | Flint Hill, VA 22627 | $308,950 |
3 | Louis P Moore | Flint Hill, VA 22627 | $288,297 |
4 | Tk Exports Inc | Boston, VA 22713 | $250,000 |
5 | Greenwood Cattle LLC | Washington, VA 22747 | $232,041 |
6 | Lane Agrico Inc D/b/a/ Bell Ranch | Woodville, VA 22749 | $222,147 |
7 | Manor Farm | Washington, VA 22747 | $170,015 |
8 | Lee Partnership | Washington, VA 22747 | $159,092 |
9 | Yowell Farm Enterprises Inc | Etlan, VA 22719 | $116,334 |
10 | Monira K Rifaat | Washington, VA 22747 | $112,197 |
11 | Mount Vernon Farm, LLC | Sperryville, VA 22740 | $88,347 |
12 | Robert H Haskell | Washington, VA 22747 | $84,191 |
13 | Jordan River Farm Inc | Flint Hill, VA 22627 | $76,831 |
14 | Sam Hopper | Flint Hill, VA 22627 | $72,722 |
15 | Arthur B Zimmerli | Fairfax, VA 22032 | $71,980 |
16 | Susan Hoffman | Sperryville, VA 22740 | $68,468 |
17 | Jenkins Orchard | Woodville, VA 22749 | $65,134 |
18 | Alexander Sharp | Washington, VA 22747 | $65,061 |
19 | James F Massie | Amissville, VA 20106 | $64,227 |
20 | Gerrit M De Wit | Boston, VA 22713 | $62,864 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>