Counter Cyclical Program in Shenandoah County, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 132
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Shenandoah County, Virginia totaled $357,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Thomas Fleming Inc | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $25,556 |
2 | David L Hovatter | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $24,875 |
3 | D A L Farms Inc | Woodstock, VA 22664 | $22,241 |
4 | Meadowview Dairy Farms Inc | New Market, VA 22844 | $14,148 |
5 | Floyd Edward Baker | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $13,872 |
6 | Lonnie F Eaton & Sons Inc | New Market, VA 22844 | $11,531 |
7 | Joseph W Beckenstrater Jr | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $11,127 |
8 | French Brothers Dairy LLC | Woodstock, VA 22664 | $10,224 |
9 | Donnie E Estep | New Market, VA 22844 | $8,284 |
10 | Denny W Shirley | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $7,735 |
11 | Wilkins Brothers Dairy LLC | New Market, VA 22844 | $7,330 |
12 | D & M Farms LLC | Edinburg, VA 22824 | $7,326 |
13 | Dean A Shillingburg | Woodstock, VA 22664 | $7,007 |
14 | Hockman Farms LLC | Strasburg, VA 22657 | $7,000 |
15 | Franwood Farms Inc | New Market, VA 22844 | $6,962 |
16 | Day Enterprises Lp | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $6,762 |
17 | Harry B Polk Jr | Mount Jackson, VA 22842 | $6,380 |
18 | Guy M Gochenour | Woodstock, VA 22664 | $6,057 |
19 | William A Zirkle | New Market, VA 22844 | $5,983 |
20 | Grandview Dairy LLC | Quicksburg, VA 22847 | $5,448 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>